Latest work Scalable Decision-Focused Learning through Cost-Sensitive Regression Preprint · 2026 Publications

Research: machine learning for decision making. Noah Schutte, PhD researcher at TU Delft.

  • PhD researcher · Delft University of Technology
  • Algorithmics group
  • Epistemic AI project

About

Learning to decide

Noah Schutte is a PhD researcher in the Algorithmics group at TU Delft. He works on decision-focused learning and predict-then-optimize: training machine-learning models for the quality of the decisions they feed, rather than for prediction accuracy alone. His background is in mathematical optimization, stochastic programming and machine learning.

01

Predict, then decide

Routes, schedules and energy plans depend on numbers nobody knows in advance, so a model predicts them first.

02

Learn for the decision

Decision-focused learning trains that model on how good the final decision is, instead of how close each prediction is.

03

Robust and scalable

His methods make that training hold up when data is noisy or limited, and keep it fast on bigger problems.

Supervisors

Neil Yorke-Smith
Krzysztof Postek

Group

Algorithmics, Software Technology, EEMCS

Project

Epistemic AI

AI with guarantees on its predictions and decisions, through proper modelling of real-world uncertainty.

News

Latest

  1. News items live in js/config.js

    Add conference visits, talks and new papers there.

Publications

Papers

4 papers
  1. 2026
    Preprint

    Scalable Decision-Focused Learning through Cost-Sensitive Regression

    Noah Schutte, Senne Berden, Tias Guns, Krzysztof Postek, Neil Yorke-Smith

    arXiv:2605.18005 · May 2026

    Decision-focused learning trains a prediction model on how good the final decision is. The catch: it usually re-solves the whole optimization problem over and over during training, which gets slow fast. This paper recasts the task as cost-sensitive regression, where over- and under-predictions are penalised by what they do to the decision. It needs at most one solve per training example, matches the best existing methods on decision quality, and scales to problem sizes decision-focused learning had not handled before.

    • Scalability
    • Cost-sensitive regression
    • Combinatorial optimization
  2. 2026
    IJCAI 2026

    Sufficient Decision Proxies for Decision-Focused Learning

    Noah Schutte, Grigorii Veviurko, Krzysztof Postek, Neil Yorke-Smith

    Proceedings of the 35th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-26, pp. 2337-2345

    To plan under uncertainty, a model can predict one scenario (a single best guess) or a full probability distribution. This paper looks at which features of a problem decide what kind of prediction, a "decision proxy", is enough to make a good decision, and proposes new options that add little computation. It is tested on continuous and discrete problems where both the goal and the constraints are uncertain.

    • Decision proxies
    • Uncertainty
    • IJCAI 2026
  3. 2024
    IJCAI 2024

    Robust Losses for Decision-Focused Learning

    Noah Schutte, Krzysztof Postek, Neil Yorke-Smith

    Proceedings of the 33rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-24, pp. 4868-4875

    Decision-focused learning usually trains on "regret": how much worse a decision is than the best possible one for each past example. But the best decision for a single noisy example can be far from the best decision on average, so the model learns the wrong lesson. The paper measures how randomness and lack of knowledge both distort this signal, then proposes three more robust loss functions. They improve results on unseen data without extra training time, on shortest-path, travelling-salesperson and energy-scheduling problems.

    • Robust optimization
    • Loss functions
    • IJCAI 2024
  4. 2024
    IJCAI 2024

    Optimization Under Epistemic Uncertainty Using Prediction

    Noah Schutte

    Proceedings of the 33rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-24, Doctoral Consortium, pp. 8504-8505

    His PhD agenda in two pages. Optimization models often pretend the world is certain so they can be solved. Uncertainty that comes from missing knowledge, called epistemic uncertainty, is especially hard to model. The aim: make decisions more robust in practice without making the models harder to solve, with decision-focused learning as the main tool.

    • PhD agenda
    • Epistemic uncertainty
    • Sole author

Sources: IJCAI proceedings, arXiv, TU Delft. New papers are added automatically from dblp.